Social networks can be used to communicate with those you
already know, to build relationships, to express a distinct view or voice, to
share information (a news source), to promote a brand/product/company/person,
to maintain a space for a group to easily function, to express oneself
artistically or emotionally, and so on. It is a blank slate of sorts-- a new
way to communicate above all else. Today, the uses of the different networks is
becoming blended, as well, showing that the networks are versatile and
constantly changing in purpose. "The line between professional networking
on a site such as LinkedIn", an originally "professional
network", "and social networking on sites such as Facebook, has
become become very thin" according to Lance Hoffman, a GWU computer
science professor.
The benefits are a convergence of
ideas, the ease of networking for the better of one's professional and social
circles, platforms to more effectively communicate with the younger generation,
an opportunity for more efficient target marketing, an environmental shift away
further away from paper, and so forth. The New York Times published a piece discussing
Obama's positive use of social media in his campaigning. Social networks
allowed him to "create an unforeseen force
to raise money, organize locally, fight smear campaigns and get out the
vote" as well as instantly engage millions of supporters. The
"dark side" of social networking is a lack of privacy, an increase in
recklessness and sharing too much personal information which can open us up to
more dangers, an immobile society who sits at computers for too much of the
day, an abandonment of traditional socializing which in turn will detract from
society's ability to interact face-to-face, the ability for personalized manipulation
through marketing, an increase in internet bullying,
and so forth. On the topic of privacy and recklessness, as noted in a speech at Wharton, those on
social networks are increasingly "casually
posting accounts of their lives for their friends — and the world — to
see." These networks create records and a new sort of fingerprint.
This
issue-- of long-term documentation of our every personal move-- is being examined, and the examining of this issue is being capitalized
on as we speak-- by companies like Frankly and then the better-known Snapchat.
These companies are producing products that offer ephemeral socialization--
messages that disappear after seen. This is meant to erase the fingerprint.
Google is allowing users to remove their pasts from the search engine as well.
Ephemerality is where social networking is headed. This is beneficial to us in
some ways, but probably not quite as beneficial as most think-- the messages
aren't disappearing 100%, and the platforms will soon move toward increased
hosting of advertisements. It's yet to come to a magical resolution, and
probably never will. But, for now, we have to keep playing their game in order
to stay in the overall game-- in which we must maintain our social lives and maintain aptitude for the demands of our jobs.
I do hope that these data will be short lived. My Facebook account is full of ads that I recently or previously searched. In all honesty, it's a bit creepy. Data mining is a bit invasive on some level. On another note, your posts are quite informative and I enjoy your blogs a lot. You surely do love blogging. Wonderful post.
ReplyDelete